GENE ONLINE|News &
Opinion
Blog

2021-12-20| Trials & Approvals

EMA Rejects Marketing Authorization Application of Aduhelm

by Arvind C. Shekhar
Share To

The Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) of the European Medicines Agency (EMA) has denied approval for the Marketing Authorization Application (MAA) of Biogen and Eisai’s Alzheimer’s disease therapy Aduhelm, saying it was unconvinced by the data submitted for the drug. As of October 2017, Biogen and Eisai Co., Ltd. are collaborating on the global co-development and co-promotion of Aduhelm.

Biogen Netherlands B.V., the company that applied for authorization, can seek a re-examination of the opinion by the CHMP within the next 15 days and has already said it will do so seeking clarification on the grounds for refusal of the marketing application.

Aduhelm and its Proposed Mode of Action 

 

Aduhelm was intended for the treatment of the early stages of Alzheimer’s disease known as mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and mild Alzheimer’s disease dementia. 

Aducanumab, the active compound in Aduhelm, is a monoclonal antibody that attaches to amyloid beta which forms plaques in the brains of people with Alzheimer’s disease. The accumulation of amyloid beta plaques in the brain is a defining pathophysiological feature of Alzheimer’s disease. Aducanumab was expected to help clear the plaques away and delay the worsening of the disease. 

The company presented results of two main studies of over 3,000 patients with early stage Alzheimer’s disease comparing the effects of a low- and high-dose of Aduhelm with the effects of placebo (a dummy treatment). The studies looked at how the patients’ symptoms changed after 78 weeks  of treatment using a standard scoring system known as CDR-SB.

Conflicting Results and Side Effects 

 

The European Medicines Agency noted that, although Aduhelm reduces amyloid beta in the brain, the link between this effect and clinical improvement had not been established. Results from the main studies were conflicting and did not show overall that Aduhelm was effective at treating adults with early stage Alzheimer’s disease.

In addition, the studies show that Aduhelm was not sufficiently safe and can cause serious side effects including Amyloid Related Imaging Abnormalities (ARIA), a side effect where some people may have symptoms such as headache, confusion, dizziness, vision changes and nausea. As images from brain scans of some patients showed abnormalities suggestive of swelling or bleeding, which could potentially cause harm. “It is not clear that the abnormalities can be properly monitored and managed in clinical practice” said EMA in a question and answer document published alongside the CHMP decision.

Therefore, the Agency’s opinion was that the benefits of Aduhelm did not outweigh its risks and it recommended refusing marketing authorisation.

Reactions to the Decision

 

The decision of the EMA has been welcomed by many researchers and clinicians including Prof Robert Howard, Professor of Old Age Psychiatry, UCL Division of Psychiatry, who said “This is absolutely the decision that we should have expected from the EMA’s expert advisory panel and is consistent with the FDA’s Advisory Committee who voted unanimously 12 months ago against approval of aducanumab because of a lack of demonstrable efficacy in the pivotal phase 3 trials. He also added that “Aducanumab is a treatment without convincing efficacy, with serious associated adverse effects and a high financial cost”.

On the contrary, Priya Singhal, Biogen’s interim head of R&D asserted “For Europeans impacted by Alzheimer’s disease, the lack of options to treat its early stages is felt every day”, she added “The longer we wait, the more people will progress toward more advanced dementia and we may miss the opportunity to potentially treat them,”

Patient organizations have also expressed disappointment on EMA’s decision stressing that there were still no therapies that can slow down cognitive decline in people with dementia. 

David Thomas, Head of Policy at Alzheimer’s Research UK, called for “continuing work at pace to ensure researchers are developing a broad pipeline of potential new treatments for diseases like Alzheimer’s, and that health systems like the NHS will be ready to deliver them in the years ahead.”

©www.geneonline.com All rights reserved. Collaborate with us: [email protected]
Related Post
Restoring Brain Energy Reverses Alzheimer’s Pathology in Mice and Points to Clinical Recovery Pathways
2026-01-22
Japan’s 2025 Bioindustry Awards: From Alzheimer’s Treatments to Regenerative Medicine, the Nation Charts Its Next Biotech Course
2025-10-16
Fighting Alzheimer’s Disease with a ‘Younger’ Brain? The Science of Brain Age and Resilience
2025-09-21
LATEST
Study Highlights Improved Outcomes in Mandibular Reconstruction Using Patient-Specific Implants
2026-01-25
Study Explores Role of Peer Recovery Coaches in Substance Use Recovery Programs Across the United States
2026-01-25
Study Finds No Link Between Parental Age and Offspring’s Preference for Youthful Faces
2026-01-25
Advancements in Genomic Classification of Corynebacterium diphtheriae Strains Address Microbial Resistance Challenges
2026-01-25
Study Identifies ITGB2 Axis as a Therapeutic Target in Melanoma Progression
2026-01-25
Amplicon Sequencing with Oxford Nanopore Technologies Evaluated for Detecting Small Ruminant Lentiviruses in Sheep
2026-01-25
Low Serum Albumin Levels and B-Cell Subtypes Identified as Prognostic Factors in Elderly LBCL Patients
2026-01-25
EVENT
2026-02-09
World Health Expo Dubai
Dubai Exhibition Centre, Dubai
2026-02-17
BIO Asia 2026 (Life Science Partnerships)
Hyderabad, India
2026-02-24
Rare Disease Week on Capitol Hill (Policy and Advocacy)
Capitol Hill, Washington, D.C.
2026-03-09
HIMSS26 (Digital Health & Hospital IT)
Las Vegas, Nevada
2026-03-23
DCAT Week
New York, USA
Scroll to Top