GENE ONLINE|News &
Silicon Valley in the Crosshairs as EU Readies to Strike U.S. Big Tech
The European Union (EU) is preparing to retaliate against U.S. tariffs with its new “anti-coercion instrument” (ACI), marking a major escalation in transatlantic trade tensions. If Donald Trump moves forward with sweeping tariffs on European exports, Brussels is ready to retaliate—this time expanding the fight beyond goods to services. These measures, echoing his previous trade policies, are set to hit major industries hard—particularly automotive, machinery, pharmaceuticals, biotech, and big data—while further escalating tensions between Washington and its key allies. Although presented as a measure to correct trade imbalances, the tariffs will likely impose the greatest burden on consumers and businesses worldwide, disrupting supply chains and economic stability.
EU Prepares Retaliatory Strike on Silicon Valley in Response to Trump’s Trade War
According to officials familiar with the discussions, the European Commission is considering using the ACI to target US service industries, particularly Big Tech, as a countermeasure to Trump’s trade policies. Initially developed during Trump’s first term, this tool previously served as a deterrent against China. Now, the European Commission views it as a critical defense against U.S. economic pressure. Essentially the ACI empowers the EU to impose restrictions if a foreign government uses tariffs to exert political or economic pressure.This mechanism would allow the EU to target American service industries, particularly Big Tech.
EU officials argue that Trump’s past threats—such as pressuring Denmark to sell Greenland or attempting to halt European enforcement actions against US tech firms—would qualify as coercion under the instrument’s framework. “All options are on the table,” one official stated, adding that the ACI offers the EU’s most robust response without breaching international trade laws. These measures would move to affect Silicon Valley in particular, potentially escalating the conflict into the services sector. The EU could revoke intellectual property protections, restrict commercial exploitation of U.S. software and streaming services, and impose limitations on foreign direct investment. Additionally, the Commission may curb access to European markets for American banking, insurance, and other financial service firms.
However, while the EU has extensive experience managing tariff disputes over goods, expanding the conflict to include services and intellectual property rights presents new challenges.
Silicon Valley and Financial Services in the Crosshairs
Dubbed a “bazooka” when it came into force in 2023, the ACI allows the EU to select from a range of punitive measures. These could include revoking intellectual property protections for US firms, restricting software licensing and streaming services, or curbing foreign direct investment into the bloc.
Another key pillar of U.S. economic influence, financial services, could also face significant impacts. The ACI gives Brussels the authority to limit market access for US banks, insurance providers, and fintech firms, disrupting a key revenue stream for American corporations operating in Europe.
Despite the ACI’s potential power, some EU officials remain wary of escalating trade tensions into new domains, particularly services and intellectual property rights. “We know how to handle tariffs on goods, but this would be a major shift,” one senior official warned. However, with Trump poised to impose sweeping tariffs on European exports, Brussels appears ready to match Washington’s aggressive trade stance with equally forceful countermeasures.
Why Is the EU a Targeted?
During a recent press conference, Trump justified his tariff plan by citing the US trade deficit with the EU. He claimed the deficit ranged from $300 billion to $350 billion, though official US government figures from 2022 place it at just over $131 billion. Trump argued that Europe benefits disproportionately from trade with the US, stating: “They don’t take our cars, they don’t take our farm products, they take almost nothing – and we take everything from them.”
In reality, EU data from Eurostat for 2023 shows that the bloc exported €502 billion worth of goods to the US while importing €344 billion in return, leading to a €158 billion trade surplus for Europe. However, when factoring in services, the US actually holds a €104 billion surplus in that sector. Experts contend that Trump’s claims of unfair trade lack substantial evidence, arguing that trade imbalances naturally arise from differences in production costs, consumer preferences, and economic structures.
Economic Consequences: Flat 10% Tariffs on EU Exports Could Lead to GDP Loss of Up to 0.9%
If enacted, the tariffs will impact a broad range of European goods. Trump had already imposed a 25% tariff on all imports from Mexico and Canada—excluding Canadian oil and gas, which face a 10% import tax. However, in the latest turn of events, the US administration paused the Canadian and Mexican tariffs for 30 days, with the expectation of Canada boosting border security and Mexico deploying troops. Meanwhile, a 10% tariff on Chinese imports took effect, leading to retaliatory tariffs from Beijing.
Historically, Trump has targeted European steel and aluminum industries, implementing 10 percent and 25% tariffs respectively during his first term. In response, the EU retaliated with tariffs on quintessential American products such as bourbon, motorcycles, and blue jeans. Analysts expect the EU to introduce a new wave of countermeasures if Trump reinstates tariffs.
The impact of these tariffs on Europe could be severe. Experts warn that flat tariffs of 10% on all EU exports could slash 0.5 to 0.9% off the bloc’s gross domestic product (GDP). Given that EU GDP growth is projected to be only 1.5% in 2025, rising to 1.8 percent in 2026, such a reduction would be a significant economic setback. Germany, in particular, faces challenges beyond US tariffs. China’s growing production of high-tech machinery has weakened Germany’s export-driven economic model by reducing its reliance on European imports. The combination of US tariffs and China’s shift toward self-sufficiency places Germany’s industrial sector in an especially precarious position.
Related posts:
Trump Administration’s Halt on Federal Health Agency Communications Raises Alarming Transparency Risks
Biotech on the Ballot: How the U.S. Presidential Election Puts Industry Policy to the Test
Are U.S. Export Controls on Biotechnology Equipment Enough to Prevent Malicious Threats to National Security?
Five Biotech Stocks Soar: Eyes on Halozyme, United Therapeutics, Harmony, Ligand, and ADMA
